Recent Updates Page 2 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Suhit Anantula 6:05 pm on November 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death? 

    Uh-oh. Are we actually losing our market leadership position because we're careful?

    It's entirely possible. Think of it this way: If you're growing at 50 percent a year, and your competitor is growing at 100 percent a year, it takes only eight years before your competitor is 10 times bigger than you. And when it's 10 times bigger than you, it can buy 10 times as much advertising and do 10 times as many projects and have meetings with 10 times as many customers. And you begin to disappear.

    via Does Slow Growth Equal Slow Death?.

    Advertisements
     
  • Suhit Anantula 4:56 pm on November 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    And they want us to hand over $6 trillion, on the basis that their quality control and homogenisation was perfectly done? Alchemy, anyone? http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/29/u-cru/#more-13371

    Citation
     
  • Suhit Anantula 4:48 pm on November 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    Medieval Warm Period 

     

     

     

     

     

    Medieval Warm Period.

     
  • Suhit Anantula 4:42 pm on November 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

     
  • Suhit Anantula 4:41 pm on November 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    I’ve spent 4 decades studying global climate change and as a scientist I am appalled at Krugman’s cavalier shrugging off the Hadley email scandal as ‘just the way scientists talk among themselves.’ That’s like saying it’s alright for politicians to be corrupt because that’s the way they are. Legitimate scientists do not doctor data, delete data they don’t like, hide data they don’t want seen, hijack the peer review process, personally attack other scientists whose views differ from theirs, send fraudulent data to the IPCC that is used to perpetuate the greatest hoax in the history science, provide false data to further legislation on climate change that will result in huge profits for corrupt lobbyists and politicians, and tell outright lies about scientific data.

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/29/quote-of-the-week-krugmans-lol-on-skeptics/#more-13401
     
  • Suhit Anantula 4:07 pm on November 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    Just finished reading the speech by Stephen McIntyre from climateaudit.org on the hockey stick graph. Fascinating stuff. How the hell is there no data to be audited but also there is no audit by IPCC on the main issues. Troubling

     
  • Suhit Anantula 11:56 am on November 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    “When all else fails, manipulate the data”. That quote is on one of my t-shirts.

     
  • Suhit Anantula 11:30 am on November 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    Doing business in the dark – Alan Kohler – News – Business Spectator 

    Australia is also under-compensating coal miners – they say to the tune of $10 billion or so – and transferring the cash saved from them and the electricity generators to low and middle-income households in the form of cash compensation.

     

    This is a deliberate strategy by the Rudd government to buy re-election in 2013 through taxing the profits of coal miners and electricity generators.

    Also, by low-balling the assumed carbon price, they are potentially understating revenues by up to $10 billion in the forward estimates. If the price turns out to be $35 for the 2013 federal budget, they will be swimming in cash for the election that year.

     

    The 2010 re-election plan was handed to them by Malcolm Turnbull’s passion for emissions trading, and his decision to choose that over leading a united party to an election fought over climate change.

    via Doing business in the dark – Alan Kohler – News – Business Spectator.

     
  • Suhit Anantula 10:54 am on November 30, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    Climate change data dumped – Times Online 

    SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

    It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

    The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.

    The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.

    via Climate change data dumped – Times Online.

     
  • Suhit Anantula 10:51 pm on November 29, 2009 Permalink | Reply  

    ClimateGate Who’s Who 

    YouTube – ClimateGate Who’s Who.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel